How To Leverage the Science of Relationships to Gain True Influence

How To Leverage the Science of Relationships to Gain True Influence

Reader Comments (40)

  1. Superbly put, Tom, and thanks for giving us all a laugh about Klout scores at the beginning.

    However, there is one thing I cannot get over.

    I’m amazed that anyone even bothered to conduct a study to show that the strongest friendships developed between students was amongst those who lived next to each other on the same floor.

    I would’ve thought this was patently obvious.

    Just wondered whether you also thought the same when you came across it.

    • Kevin,

      I wasn’t but here is why — the Westgate buildings were not huge towers but small, two story buildings. I think the total apt count in each was maybe 16 or 20? Thus, one would think that all of those students would “be friends” given a year of living in such close proximity.

      I reference the study because it’s the cleanest example of Propinquity — but there are many others over the years that examine incidence of marriage amongst people who grew up within 5 miles of one another, etc.

      The whole idea of propinquity and it’s role in marketing is a big interest of mine.

      thanks for commenting.

      • Thanks for replying Tom.

        And, of course, the study is direct proof rather than just something we know from everyday experience. Obvious or not, it still gives more weight to the great points in your article.

    • I feel this is an obvious observation too, but I’m glad to know someone gave it a name and catalogued it.

      Till now, I thought it was just one of the myriad observations I make in my daily life–basic observations that I don’t feel everyone cares to spend time on, but these fundamentals are fascinating–and useful, as this post shows. Having these fundamentals accounted for by scientists makes life feel less tenuous to me, more controlled and tangible, and I like that.

      Anyway, I’m clearly not a scientist. Just a freelance editor. Haha.

      I loved the article. Thanks for sharing.

  2. Frequency is essential. It’s easier with multiple contributors, because with a single person focusing on content creation, quality can suffer as frequency increases.

    I’m working with a client who has drifted to low frequency on the blog and email newsletter, and it’s really hampered our ability to create that regular visibility.

    The issue: regular content with a higher frequency (and small staff) has lower quality, which the client doesn’t want on their blog.

    So here’s a question: is it more effective to have frequent content if it’s not regularly dense? I’ve seen some places like pull this off, but generally, most high-frequency bloggers I’ve seen offer lots of small-scale posts just to be seen.

    I’d be interested to see some stats on if / how this has affected their conversions.

    • Caelan,

      Haven’t seen anyone test that idea… but agree, there is a lot of noise trying to pass itself of as valuable content marketing.

      However, one important point in a propinquity marketing strategy — you don’t necessarily want all of the touches to occur on your owned platforms. It’s important to find embassies and outposts (like this blog for instance) where prospects can find your content as well.

      So to your client’s challenge — maybe the goal should be to repurpose that content on other platforms vs just amping up more lower quality content on their owned platforms.


  3. I really enjoyed reading your post: thanks for your contribution here.

    It is important to participate in the conversation and to add value. You can do that by commenting on blogs, but now there are also forums in which you can participate.

    I know this from personal experience, because I am always being asked to join such places/locations where enriching conversations occur.

    In the past, such places did not exist, but now more and more people are taking advantage of such new oppnortunities, which is not always such a good thing. There is scope for the trivial and de facto conversations can be marginalized or glossed over in favour of quick fixes and the need for instant gratification.

    By all means, let the good times roll, but there is also something to be said about “patience is a virtue” and developing the skill of delayed gratification.

    Have a good one.

    • Couldn’t agree more Archan… my buddy Mack Collier speaks often of the power of commenting to grow influence. Check him out… I think you’ll like his writing.

  4. Definitely agree with your approach of mapping out a propinquity platform.

    Today there seems to be too many hit and miss approaches to finding the right audience.

    Through the mapping process you are able to determine where your audience is in their buying cycle. This will allow you to provide better focused and more valuable messaging to them.

    • Thanks Patricia … so far it’s worked for us… will be interesting to see how it works for the rest of the world once the new book publishes and the masses get an inside look at the process.

  5. Good thoughts about building around propinquity, or a “propinquity platform” as you call it.

    I mean the law of propinquity seems quite obvious. The people physically closest to you become the people you spend the most time with, and become your best friends.

    The question of ‘how does this work online’? is an interesting.. ‘how does it work within marketing content’ to readers?

    I think the easiest starting point is: your real-life friends become your first readers and first email subscribers…. but, then you have to build and scale from there, and that’s where things can get more difficult.

    • Thanks William… certainly multiple exposures to prospective readers in platforms they already value (like here on Copyblogger) effects the reader’s willingness to subscribe to your content in your own channel vs just reading it on the third party platforms IMO.

  6. I really appreciate how you’ve practically taken us through these four key steps. Makes a lot of sense. Keeping in mind that influence and relationship results from an exchange, not a constant monologue, is evidenced by the power of guest blogging and commenting on blogs. And replying to comments further builds the relationship. I guess like in offline or “real life/time” relationships, good online relationships require the personal investment of time and effort.
    Thanks…great post!

    • Thanks Elise,

      Yes, there is a reason long-distance relationships tend to fail… that lack of interaction causes a weakening of ties IMO.

  7. What? Your Klout score doesn’t mean anything. Oh no!

    Seriously though. This is a fantastic article on the science of relationships to gain true influence.

    I started participating in a Friday Twitter chat from Dan Zarrella at Hub Spot. Not only do I learn more about the science behind social media, but I get to engage with others on the chat. I never thought about “creating a Twitter list of all the participants.” Thanks for the tip.

    I have two tips for creating a trusted propinquity platform: 1) be yourself and 2) be helpful.

  8. Tom-

    Thanks for your great article. It’s interesting how some things – like if you live closer to someone, you’re more likely to become better friends with them – are so “obvious” in our daily lives that we forget to apply them to our businesses.

    I love it when someone does a scientific study that forces me to reexamine a concept in a different way… and also gives me a cool new word to use to describe it, of course!

    Your recommended steps are excellent, and I’m going to see how I can implement them to grow my business.



  9. It’s a really great post! I had to “Google” a few terms but hey that’s always good right? What I find interesting are these concepts that you speak of, happen everyday and happen naturally. I like how you’re suggesting not to leave it to chance and to set our selves up for success when it comes to forming the level of relationship it requires to achieve an influence with the readers. This was a great post thanks for sharing the concepts.

    • Brian,

      Sorry about that… I probably should have placed anchor links to blogs with a bit more depth and description — making a note to do that for future posts.

      Glad you liked the post… hope the technique works as well for you as it has for me.

  10. Tom,

    This is one of the best posts I’ve read here on copyblogger.

    Marketing is all about common sense. I see a lot of people complicating online marketing just because the marketing channels are different from the real world.

    But in reality, the principles remain almost the same.

    Great post.

    • Jawad,

      I may frame your comment my friend. Given the quality of authors that frequent this blog that is one of the biggest compliments I’ve ever received.

      Thanks for that…glad you liked the post. I’m all about simplification… usually where the biggest ideas are found.

  11. Good to see something about quality not quantity re Social Media. Time to outlaw the follower collectors – they are the equivalent of email junk and just obscure or pollute the quality that IS to be found out there!?!

  12. Tom, great post! I love how you “intellectualized” this process and compared it to a scientific law. This is a concept I explain to clients all the time, and I appreciate very much that you’ve given me a much simpler way to boil this down. Great stuff, look forward to more from you!

  13. Hello Tom
    this post is amazing.
    people are so fascinating, ideas, tools that brings us closer to what they need are good
    I am going to put the steps into action
    Many thanks

  14. Hi Tom,
    That was really one of its kind information. By the way I also feel that while creating content either it be video or just an article if we use “You” to address reader can also help build psychological propinquity.

  15. Tom,
    Very interesting article. I found it very eye opening, especially the four steps that will help build the propinquity platform. I also agree that leaving it to chance may never play out. I look forward to reading more about this.

  16. Great post!! Very useful and something I’ve been looking into for a while now. It’s a bit difficult for me because I don’t have a very restricted, straightforward target niche but I’m working on narrowing it down to shared values and beliefs (and not a certain demographic or one particular interest), which is very doable I think.

    Also, I have come to make my stuff slowly but surely more personal and not so matter of fact or theorectical, because even if it’s well written, people have a hard time identifying with the content. Seems they crave to hear about my personal experiences and views and little anecdotes from my life, which I was uncomfortable about at first because it takes some guts to just throw yourself out there into the open sea of both sharks and dolphins – metaphor over – but it’s what they seem to respond to most. 😉

    Similar to what Dan Kennedy talks about in his course on influential writing, which I can really recommend for anyone trying to build influence, by the way (and I say that without being in any way affiliated to his stuff). He also mentiones turning yourself into a fictional character – without lying of course – but telling stories that they can follow, so they will create a relationship with you in their heads.

    The only problem is: it all has to be somewhat planned. And I tend to do better just going with the flow and not overthinking it. It makes me a bit too self-conscious and scared that a wrong move could wreck it all and then I get stuck in analysis-paralysis…

  17. What an excellent interpretation of propinquity in marketing, excellent resource. Thank you so much, keep up the good work.

  18. This is an awesome article Tom. The science behind it makes sense, but I am especially appreciative of the game plan. We often think people will flock to our blogs because our content is good, when in reality it is the Know. Like. Trust. combination that is the true generator of faithful subscribers. Thanks for posting!

This article's comments are closed.