Lately, a common theme in productivity advice is bashing multitasking.
“You suck at multitasking!” shrieks one headline. “Multitasking: the most dangerous productivity killer” hisses another.
And they aren’t wrong. Studies have shown that trying to tackle different tasks simultaneously greatly reduces our cognitive abilities.
But what if I told you there’s another type of multitasking — one you’re probably really good at?
The two types of multitasking
For me, the word “multitasking” brings to mind an image of a harried professional being pulled in several directions.
She may be trying to prepare for her upcoming presentation, respond to IMs from her boss, and coordinate with her husband to pick up their sick child from daycare, all at the same time.
Just thinking about it kicks my heart rate up a notch.
But now, think about the same professional, perhaps just a few hours earlier, as she was pulling together the information she needed for her presentation.
It’s likely she was referencing several different sources, synthesizing her knowledge of her topic, structuring her presentation, and writing her slides all at the same time.
Technically, both scenarios could be called “multitasking.” But their outcomes are incredibly different: The second scenario engenders calm and focus, whereas the first might spark a heart attack.
Some experts have given the first kind of multitasking a new name — switch-tasking — which gives us a clue as to why the outcomes are so different.
When you switch-task, you divide your attention among several different goals. But in the second kind of multitasking, all tasks contribute to the same goal. This goal-oriented task-juggling is the type of multitasking you likely excel at.
In fact, some anthropologists believe the capacity to multitask was one of the abilities that helped Homo sapiens thrive in the first place.
The distracted Stone Age?
In his book, The Distraction Addiction, Alex Soojung-Kim Pang highlights two anthropologists, Lyn Wadley and Monica Smith, who both separately found evidence of multitasking in the Stone Age.
Wadley and her team discovered evidence of a carefully mixed adhesive from 70,000 years ago that “would have been impossible without multitasking and abstract thought.” Smith believes that the ability to walk around on two feet, pick up objects and scan for dangers would have necessarily engendered multitasking abilities.
“Multitasking let our species create more complex social rituals and technologies and, eventually, a more sedentary and urban way of life.”
– Alex Soojung-Kim Pang
Our culture likes to paint multitasking as a modern evil — born of our distraction-laden technologies — but it turns out multitasking has been part of our nature for thousands of years.
So what happened?
The power of the notification
For most of human history, our tools and technologies have all been in obvious service of our goals. Humans made chipped stone tools to cut things, adhesives to stick things together, homes to shelter us, plows to plant fields, cars to get around …
It wasn’t until the telephone that our technologies began to talk back.
Before telephones, we got information by talking directly to others, reading newspapers, reading books, and so on. We would absorb the information we needed, and act on it when we saw fit.
But the invention of the telephone also brought the invention of the notification. Growing up, I remember what it was like when my mom was elbows-deep in the kitchen making dinner and the phone rang: “Would someone please get that?”
We invented tools like telephones, computers, and smartphones to serve our goals and make our lives easier. But in doing so, we also gave them a special sort of power over us.
Now, we get so much information through our phones and computers, our intentions tend to bend to its sheer quantity.
New emails and IMs from clients and coworkers might bring to light a problem that needs solving. New updates from platforms we use might break our processes. Industry news might change how we do business.
There’s so much new all of the time, and so much potential for it to be meaningful, we have a hard time prioritizing our own intentions.
Instead of setting our intentions and using our technology to achieve them, too often we log on in the morning and let our devices direct our days.
Don’t let your phone influence your intentions
The more I learn about our relationships with technology, the more I realize that intention is the soul of focus. Without it, we are vulnerable to any and all distractions that may come our way. In the era of immediate news and notifications, that’s downright dangerous.
We can’t let news and notifications set our goals for us. We have to learn to set them for ourselves, and hold ourselves accountable to them.
But, learning these skills is not easy. Like learning to play the violin, learning to balance technology and productivity is tacit knowledge.
No matter how much you read about what others have learned and how they learned it, you still have to learn what works for you.
So, here’s the one suggestion I’m going to give:
Take some time away from the usual flood of news and notifications to think about your daily intentions. Document them somehow — any way that works for you — and make sure you see them through.
The internet may be a powerful tool, but it will never have your best interest in mind.
Only by understanding what is important to you, and following through with it, will you be able to create a balanced, fulfilled, un-harried, focused life.
Reader Comments (16)
Helen says
This makes so much sense, thank you! Of course, there are different types of multi-tasking. I’ve become aware recently how split-tasking REALLY affects my productivity, but actually in writing blog posts I sometimes HAVE to be on social media (if I’m blogging about that platform for example) or reading about the topic. It’s about being aware of what are necessary multi-tasks and what are split-tasks.
Loryn Thompson says
I’m glad you liked the post, Helen! I figure that it doesn’t matter as much what technology you’re using, as long as you only focus on one goal (writing your post) and don’t get distracted (by responding to notifications), you’ll be just fine 🙂 Thanks for reading!!
Jane Rucker says
Goal-oriented task-juggling, that’s a really good term for it. This post is so right-on and timely. Great information for all who want to be work effectively! Thanks for sharing.
Loryn Thompson says
Thanks, Jane! So glad you liked it!!
Michael LaRocca, Technical Editor says
I was taking a class in which we listen to a one-hour lecture every week, and I saw a classmate knitting. Perfect multitasking.
I was going to write more, but my phone’s beeping.
Loryn Thompson says
Yes! I love having something to do with my hands while listening to a podcast or video. And yes, you better go get that phone 😉
Philip Carino says
Super sensible. I’ve been waiting for an article that would stay away from the trend and somehow defend multitasking as much hype has been about bashing it! Love your parting thoughts Loryn! Truly, fascinating to hear an advice that makes us explore and not just spoonfeed it to the readers. Thanks and will share this to everyone!!
Loryn Thompson says
Thank you, Philip! When it comes to hype-y topics (especially in the marketing world!), it’s rare that something is truly laudable or deplorable. The reality usually lies somewhere between 🙂
Thanks for reading!
Freddy G. Cabrera says
Hey Loryn!
This is very interesting. I’ve learned something new today.
I see the difference now of the types of “multi-tasking”.
I multitask a lot. But I do it in that one way you are talking about here. I multitask with tasks I have to get done towards One goal. All of the things I’m working on are contributing to this one goal I am after. So, in a way, this type of multitasking is helping me get more done a lot faster. At least that is what I’m thinking! haha
Thanks for sharing this!
Cheers! 😀
Loryn Thompson says
Thanks, Freddy! Yep, I think you’ve got it exactly. It’s not about *how much* you’re doing, but rather how many goals you’re trying to achieve.
Just yesterday I tried to water my plants while cooking breakfast. Let’s just say I had to start over again on the breakfast 😉
LJ Sedgwick says
This is so true! It’s right that one type of multi-tasking makes sense when everything is aligned towards the same end goal, unlike the stressful scenario of trying to spin plates at different speeds and in different directions. I actually do the ‘productive’ version quite a lot when I’m writing blog posts, and it doesn’t even feel like multi-tasking, but ask me to reply to an email while answering the phone? Nope, won’t happen!
Loryn Thompson says
Right? It’s as if the goal-oriented kind of multitasking is so natural, we don’t even realize we’re multitasking when we’re doing it. Thanks for reading, LJ!
Ricky says
I suck at multitasking but the way you put it actually will help me, thank you Loryn.
Loryn Thompson says
Good deal! Thanks for reading, Ricky!
Stefan Alexander says
Hi Loryn,
Great article! I love how you explained the two different types of multi-tasking. Often, we do find ourselves doing the second type when we are focused on one goal. When our full attention is given to a certain goal, we can perform many tasks that are in harmony with each other. I do that way too often when I’m researching a topic of interest, or something I’m looking to write about. I can read, analyze, categorize, and outline my topic; all that while just reading the first two articles. It all syncs up in my head while I’m reading.
Thanks again for such great content! I love it!
Stefan
Jason Marshal says
You’re so right, Loryn! If you focus on one specific goal and the different tasks lead to your desired end result, this makes a lot more sense as compared to carrying out different, unrelated tasks.
I especially liked this statement : “There’s so much new all of the time, and so much potential for it to be meaningful, we have a hard time prioritizing our own intentions.”
Nowadays, we are overwhelmed by all of the information we receive. This makes it pretty hard to stay focused on the task at hand, f.e.
This article's comments are closed.